La source principale du Quod Christus sit Deus attribué à Jean Chrysostome : la Démonstration évangélique d’Eusèbe de Césarée
Since N. G. McKendrick’s edition, critics have not paid much attention to the work entitled Quod Christus sit Deus, attributed to Chrysostomus. A precise analysis of its argumentation, notably its collection of testimonia, leads to the hypothesis that its main source is Eusebius’ Demonstratio euange...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | French |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
2012
|
| In: |
Revue d'études augustiniennes et patristiques
Year: 2012, Volume: 58, Issue: 2, Pages: 261-285 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Summary: | Since N. G. McKendrick’s edition, critics have not paid much attention to the work entitled Quod Christus sit Deus, attributed to Chrysostomus. A precise analysis of its argumentation, notably its collection of testimonia, leads to the hypothesis that its main source is Eusebius’ Demonstratio euangelica. Besides, one wonders to what extent the Quod Christus sit Deus may be a witness of the last ten lost books of the Demonstratio. Depuis l’édition de N. G. McKendrick, le Quod Christus sit Deus attribué à Chrysostome n’a guère attiré l’attention de la critique. Une analyse précise de son argumentation, et notamment du dossier de testimonia, amène à penser que sa source principale est la Démonstration évangélique d’Eusèbe. Par ailleurs, on se demande dans quelle mesure le Quod Christus sit Deus ne constitue pas un témoin des dix derniers livres perdus de la Démonstration. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2428-3606 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Revue d'études augustiniennes et patristiques
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1484/J.REA.5.101080 |
