Implied Audiences in the Areopagus Narrative

Much of the commentary tradition on Acts 17:16-34 too quickly glosses over the inclusion of Paul’s sermon in a larger narrative context, focusing instead on the religionsgeschichtliche background of the speech or its compatibility with Pauline thought as expressed in the epistles. This essay bracket...

ver descrição completa

Na minha lista:  
Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor principal: Gray, Patrick 1970- (Author)
Tipo de documento: Recurso Electrónico Artigo
Idioma:Inglês
Verificar disponibilidade: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Publicado em: 2004
Em: Tyndale bulletin
Ano: 2004, Volume: 55, Número: 2, Páginas: 205-218
Outras palavras-chave:B areopagus
B compositional strategy
B Gentile
B paul
B implied reader
B Acts
B New Testament
Acesso em linha: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Parallel Edition:Não eletrônico
Descrição
Resumo:Much of the commentary tradition on Acts 17:16-34 too quickly glosses over the inclusion of Paul’s sermon in a larger narrative context, focusing instead on the religionsgeschichtliche background of the speech or its compatibility with Pauline thought as expressed in the epistles. This essay brackets many of the questions that have occupied the history of the interpretation so as to highlight questions of literary and theological function. Close attention to Luke’s compositional technique reveals the ways in which the Areopagus narrative is not aimed at a monolithic Gentile audience but rather engages multiple implied readers while recapitulating many of the leading Lukan motifs in the mission to the Jews. The portrayal of Paul and of the responses of the Athenians to his message is suggestive of how Luke answers for his readers the question posed by Tertullian a century later, ‘What hath Athens to do with Jerusalem?’
ISSN:0082-7118
Obras secundárias:Enthalten in: Tyndale bulletin
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.53751/001c.29173