Implied Audiences in the Areopagus Narrative

Much of the commentary tradition on Acts 17:16-34 too quickly glosses over the inclusion of Paul’s sermon in a larger narrative context, focusing instead on the religionsgeschichtliche background of the speech or its compatibility with Pauline thought as expressed in the epistles. This essay bracket...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gray, Patrick 1970- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2004
In: Tyndale bulletin
Year: 2004, Volume: 55, Issue: 2, Pages: 205-218
Further subjects:B areopagus
B compositional strategy
B Gentile
B paul
B implied reader
B Acts
B New Testament
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic
Description
Summary:Much of the commentary tradition on Acts 17:16-34 too quickly glosses over the inclusion of Paul’s sermon in a larger narrative context, focusing instead on the religionsgeschichtliche background of the speech or its compatibility with Pauline thought as expressed in the epistles. This essay brackets many of the questions that have occupied the history of the interpretation so as to highlight questions of literary and theological function. Close attention to Luke’s compositional technique reveals the ways in which the Areopagus narrative is not aimed at a monolithic Gentile audience but rather engages multiple implied readers while recapitulating many of the leading Lukan motifs in the mission to the Jews. The portrayal of Paul and of the responses of the Athenians to his message is suggestive of how Luke answers for his readers the question posed by Tertullian a century later, ‘What hath Athens to do with Jerusalem?’
ISSN:0082-7118
Contains:Enthalten in: Tyndale bulletin
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.53751/001c.29173