Implied Audiences in the Areopagus Narrative

Much of the commentary tradition on Acts 17:16-34 too quickly glosses over the inclusion of Paul’s sermon in a larger narrative context, focusing instead on the religionsgeschichtliche background of the speech or its compatibility with Pauline thought as expressed in the epistles. This essay bracket...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Gray, Patrick 1970- (Verfasst von)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Veröffentlicht: 2004
In: Tyndale bulletin
Jahr: 2004, Band: 55, Heft: 2, Seiten: 205-218
weitere Schlagwörter:B areopagus
B compositional strategy
B Gentile
B paul
B implied reader
B Acts
B New Testament
Online-Zugang: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Parallele Ausgabe:Nicht-Elektronisch
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Much of the commentary tradition on Acts 17:16-34 too quickly glosses over the inclusion of Paul’s sermon in a larger narrative context, focusing instead on the religionsgeschichtliche background of the speech or its compatibility with Pauline thought as expressed in the epistles. This essay brackets many of the questions that have occupied the history of the interpretation so as to highlight questions of literary and theological function. Close attention to Luke’s compositional technique reveals the ways in which the Areopagus narrative is not aimed at a monolithic Gentile audience but rather engages multiple implied readers while recapitulating many of the leading Lukan motifs in the mission to the Jews. The portrayal of Paul and of the responses of the Athenians to his message is suggestive of how Luke answers for his readers the question posed by Tertullian a century later, ‘What hath Athens to do with Jerusalem?’
ISSN:0082-7118
Enthält:Enthalten in: Tyndale bulletin
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.53751/001c.29173