Reflections over the Symposium on Coherence of the Incoherence

This paper will address some issues raised in the insightful contributions to the symposium on my recent book Coherence of the Incoherence. First, I will examine Davat Dadikhuda’s defense of Ibn Sina against objections Ghazali raises to his proof of cosmic pre-eternity, pertaining to time and the ca...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Moad, Edward (Author)
Contributors: Hassan, Laura (Bibliographic antecedent) ; Dadikhuda, Davlat (Bibliographic antecedent) ; Muhtaroglu, Nazif (Bibliographic antecedent) ; Abdel Meguid, Ahmed (Bibliographic antecedent) ; Belo, Catarina (Bibliographic antecedent) ; Kukkonen, Taneli (Bibliographic antecedent) ; Turan, Hakan (Bibliographic antecedent)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2025
In: Theology and science
Year: 2025, Volume: 23, Issue: 3, Pages: 701-711
IxTheo Classification:BJ Islam
NBC Doctrine of God
NBD Doctrine of Creation
TG High Middle Ages
VA Philosophy
Further subjects:B Ibn Sina
B Islamic Philosophy
B Causation
B Necessity
B Ibn Rushd
B Cosmology
B Al-Ghazali
B Modality
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:This paper will address some issues raised in the insightful contributions to the symposium on my recent book Coherence of the Incoherence. First, I will examine Davat Dadikhuda’s defense of Ibn Sina against objections Ghazali raises to his proof of cosmic pre-eternity, pertaining to time and the causal relation between God and creation. Second, I will examine a critique of Ibn Sina brought by Nazif Muhtaroglu regarding the distinction between de re and de dicto necessity. Second, I will share some initial thoughts on Ahmed Abdel Meguid’s interpretation of Ghazali’s position on modality.
ISSN:1474-6719
Reference:Kommentar zu "The Principle of Sufficient Reason: An Axis of the Early Encounter of Ash‘arism with Avicennism (2025)"
Kritik von "An Adjudication Between Avicenna, Ghazālī, and Moad on the Second Avicennian Argument (2025)"
Kritik von "Ibn Sīnā and al-Ghazālī on Causality as Necessary Connection, and Occasionalism (2025)"
Kritik von "The Epistemic Import of Modal Operators and the Critique of Naturalism: Towards a New Interpretation of al-Ghazālī’s Critique of Peripatetic Essentialism and Theory of Theodicy (2025)"
Kommentar zu "Some Considerations on the Theory of Emanation in Alfarabi, Avicenna, and al-Ghazālī (2025)"
Kommentar zu "Al-Ghazālī and Ibn Rushd on the End of the World (2025)"
Kommentar zu "Ibn Rushd’s Unification of Forms in the First Form as an Early “Theory of Everything” (2025)"
Contains:Enthalten in: Theology and science
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1080/14746700.2025.2514317

Similar Items

more