Das metaphysische „sein“ bei Aristoteles: Kopula oder Existenzverb?
This article aims at further understanding the meaning and function of the verb “to be” in Aristotle’s Metaphysics: does it express mainly or even exclusively existence or is it used as a copula, linking a subject and predicate? Since the birth of Greek literature, the copula-use has been by far the...
| Autore principale: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo di documento: | Elettronico Articolo |
| Lingua: | Italiano |
| Verificare la disponibilità: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Pubblicazione: |
2020
|
| In: |
Alpha omega
Anno: 2020, Volume: 23, Fascicolo: 3, Pagine: 441-481 |
| Altre parole chiave: | B
Categories
B copula B Negazione B Metaphysics B Affermazione B Nothing B Being B Thought B Reality B negationcategories B being as truth B Existence B Aristotle |
| Accesso online: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1932473912 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20250805055525.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 250805s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||ita c | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1932473912 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1932473912 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a ita | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Gutberlet, Albert |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a Das metaphysische „sein“ bei Aristoteles: Kopula oder Existenzverb? |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This article aims at further understanding the meaning and function of the verb “to be” in Aristotle’s Metaphysics: does it express mainly or even exclusively existence or is it used as a copula, linking a subject and predicate? Since the birth of Greek literature, the copula-use has been by far the more common, and so it is also with Aristotle. He even provides us with the nucleus of a theory of the copula, which is not the case with existence in the strict philosophical sense. Analyzing Met. V, 7, VI, 4 and VIII, 2, I conclude that wherever Aristotle tries to determine, what, for being as being, it means “to be”, he refers not to existence, but to some concrete being-such, where the verb “being” functions as a copula. So while metaphysical being does also consistently carry an existential force, regarding its syntactic function it is nonetheless copulative through and through. | ||
| 601 | |a Aristoteles | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Reality | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Thought | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Categories | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Negation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Reality | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Thought | |
| 650 | 4 | |a negationcategories | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Affirmation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a being as truth | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Nothing | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Existence | |
| 650 | 4 | |a copula | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Aristotle | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Being | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Metaphysics | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Alpha omega |d Roma : Alpha Omega, 1998 |g 23(2020), 3, Seite 441-481 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)508334845 |w (DE-600)2223942-X |w (DE-576)252255666 |7 nnas |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:23 |g year:2020 |g number:3 |g pages:441-481 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://riviste.upra.org/index.php/ao/article/view/4074 |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a NOMM | ||
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4753086259 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1932473912 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20250805055525 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 250805||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2025-08-01#1B6297DC39C2C35713E13C79DAD264A0CF3D2076 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixrk |a ixzs |a zota | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Affirmation,Negation,Negation (Logic) |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Affirmation,Négation,Négation (logique) |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Afirmación,Negación,Negación (Gramática) |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Affermazione,Negazione |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 否定,否认 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 否定,否認 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Afirmação,Negação |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Отрицание,Утверждение |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Άρνηση,Επιβεβαίωση |
| SYE | 0 | 0 | |a Verneinung , Zustimmung |
