"COGITOR ERGO SUM": ON THE MEANING AND RELEVANCE OF BAADER's THEOLOGICAL CRITIQUE OF DESCARTES
This paper examines the arguments on the basis of which Franz Baader (1765-1841), the almost forgotten contemporary of Hegel and Schelling, rejected Descartes’ philosophy so decisively, that, at the end of his life, he wrote to a friend that he passionately wanted to put an end to Cartesianism. I de...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Publié: |
2005
|
| Dans: |
Modern theology
Année: 2005, Volume: 21, Numéro: 2, Pages: 237-251 |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Édition parallèle: | Non-électronique
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1929824718 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20250707085846.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 250707s2005 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/j.1468-0025.2005.00284.x |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1929824718 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1929824718 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)102966787X |0 (DE-627)734327668 |0 (DE-576)190004673 |4 aut |a Geldhof, Joris |d 1976- | |
| 109 | |a Geldhof, Joris 1976- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a "COGITOR ERGO SUM": ON THE MEANING AND RELEVANCE OF BAADER's THEOLOGICAL CRITIQUE OF DESCARTES |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2005 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This paper examines the arguments on the basis of which Franz Baader (1765-1841), the almost forgotten contemporary of Hegel and Schelling, rejected Descartes’ philosophy so decisively, that, at the end of his life, he wrote to a friend that he passionately wanted to put an end to Cartesianism. I defend the thesis that Baader's hostility to Cartesianism was ultimately grounded in a theological idea, and that his holistic and emphatically Christian thought can only be adequately understood in the light of his critique of Descartes and Cartesianism. I also suggest reasons why Baader's work might well be considered as a source of inspiration for contemporary discussions of postmodernism. | ||
| 601 | |a Theologe | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Modern theology |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1984 |g 21(2005), 2, Seite 237-251 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320573281 |w (DE-600)2016748-9 |w (DE-576)096290587 |x 1468-0025 |7 nnas |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:21 |g year:2005 |g number:2 |g pages:237-251 |
| 776 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druckausgabe |w (DE-627)1645692035 |k Non-Electronic | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0025.2005.00284.x |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |7 1 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1468-0025.2005.00284.x |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |7 1 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4743438519 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1929824718 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20250707083159 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 250707||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo |a ixrk | ||
| LOK | |0 939 |a 07-07-25 |b l01 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||
