Are Rituals Causally Opaque?: The Case of Ritual Fasting and Drug Use
Xygalatas (2022) states that rituals are causally opaque, meaning they have symbolic value and lack a practical outcome in the external world. In this commentary, I address my concerns with Xygalatas' definition of ritual, which are framed as follows: first, are rituals causally opaque, or does...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Contributors: | |
| Format: | Electronic Review |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
2025
|
| In: |
Journal for the cognitive science of religion
Year: 2022, Volume: 10, Issue: 1/2, Pages: 171-181 |
| Further subjects: | B
Book review
B Fasting B Ritual B Gender B Drug use |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | Xygalatas (2022) states that rituals are causally opaque, meaning they have symbolic value and lack a practical outcome in the external world. In this commentary, I address my concerns with Xygalatas' definition of ritual, which are framed as follows: first, are rituals causally opaque, or does the way researchers think and ask about rituals create a response bias? Second, if rituals consist of transparent outcomes, does this negate their classification as a ritual? Third, must a ritual lead to impractical outcomes to still be considered a ritual? I focus primarily on fasting and drug use in reference to the stated questions to illustrate the complexity underlying the definition of ritual. Using ethnographic examples, I highlight the need for further discussion of the definition of ritual to discern if causal opacity is truly necessary to establish a series of behaviors as ritualistic. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2049-7563 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal for the cognitive science of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1558/jcsr.24897 |
