The Nullity of the Definitive Sentence in the Jurisprudence of the Tribunal of the Roman Rota
Recognizing the generality of the motives of nullity of the sentence established in legislation, the A. explains the need for grasping the common jurisprudence of the Roman Rota in order to administer justice when the nullity of the sentence is alleged. After elucidating the general principles emplo...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
2014
|
| In: |
Studia canonica
Year: 2014, Volume: 48, Issue: 1, Pages: 5-100 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
| Summary: | Recognizing the generality of the motives of nullity of the sentence established in legislation, the A. explains the need for grasping the common jurisprudence of the Roman Rota in order to administer justice when the nullity of the sentence is alleged. After elucidating the general principles employed by the Rota in this question, he provides an organized discussion of what typically does and does not cause the nullity of the sentence according to Rotal jurisprudence. The motives for nullity are explored thematically, namely, as defects in the judge, the parties, the object of the trial, the process itself, and the sentence itself. Reconnaissant la généralité des motifs de nullité de la sentence établie par la loi, l’auteur explique la nécessité de saisir la jurisprudence commune de la Rote romaine pour administrer la justice quand la nullité de la sentence est invoquée. Après l’élucidation des principes généraux employés par la Rote dans cette question, il fournit une discussion organisée de ce que fait habituellement et ne provoque pas la nullité de la sentence selon la jurisprudence de la Rote. Les motifs de nullité sont explorés par thèmes, comme les déficiences du juge, les parties, l’objet de l’essai, le processus lui-même et la sentence elle-même. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2295-3027 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Studia canonica
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.2143/STC.48.1.3047112 |
