Pomponazzi and the Limits of Rational Theology

What is Pomponazzi’s main goal in the last three books of De fato, in which he discusses age-old conundrums such as the compatibility of free will with divine providence, the compatibility of God’s eternal ordinance with the contingency of the world, and predestination? Scholars have offered widely...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nauta, Lodi 1966- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2025
In: Vivarium
Year: 2025, Volume: 63, Issue: 2, Pages: 137-171
Further subjects:B Free Will
B Determinism
B Divine Providence
B divine foreknowledge
B Pietro Pomponazzi
B Contingency
B Predestination
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Description
Summary:What is Pomponazzi’s main goal in the last three books of De fato, in which he discusses age-old conundrums such as the compatibility of free will with divine providence, the compatibility of God’s eternal ordinance with the contingency of the world, and predestination? Scholars have offered widely divergent interpretations. The present article suggests that these interpretations can be brought into agreement by underlining what can be regarded as the main goal of De fato, namely to admit that rational theology cannot solve these issues in any rationally satisfactory manner. To show this, the article examines Pomponazzi’s views on these topics, suggesting that even when he discusses these issues “in accordance to evangelical tradition,” Pomponazzi still feels the pull towards determinism and to the idea that God acts necessarily according to the providential order established from eternity, rolling on ineluctably.
ISSN:1568-5349
Contains:Enthalten in: Vivarium
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/15685349-06302002