Rejoinder to Giovanni Maltese
In this brief rejoinder, I respond to Maltese’s three areas of questions. Taking the first two together, I explain that my use of verticality is not primarily a theological move but a theoretical one: attending to it reveals how the various structuralisms that pervade Christian ways of seeing the wo...
| Κύριος συγγραφέας: | |
|---|---|
| Τύπος μέσου: | Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Άρθρο |
| Γλώσσα: | Αγγλικά |
| Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Έκδοση: |
2024
|
| Στο/Στη: |
PentecoStudies
Έτος: 2024, Τόμος: 23, Τεύχος: 1, Σελίδες: 39-40 |
| Άλλες λέξεις-κλειδιά: | B
Theology
B Anthropology B Structuralism B Difference B Particularity |
| Διαθέσιμο Online: |
Πιθανολογούμενα δωρεάν πρόσβαση Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Σύνοψη: | In this brief rejoinder, I respond to Maltese’s three areas of questions. Taking the first two together, I explain that my use of verticality is not primarily a theological move but a theoretical one: attending to it reveals how the various structuralisms that pervade Christian ways of seeing the world are deeply entwined. In response to the third, I suggest that it is both possible and worthwhile to ascertain particularities of different cultural-religious perspectives in our work, so long as we also strive to problematize and historicize them at the same time. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1871-7691 |
| Περιλαμβάνει: | Enthalten in: PentecoStudies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1558/pent.30763 |
