Rejoinder to Giovanni Maltese
In this brief rejoinder, I respond to Maltese’s three areas of questions. Taking the first two together, I explain that my use of verticality is not primarily a theological move but a theoretical one: attending to it reveals how the various structuralisms that pervade Christian ways of seeing the wo...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
2024
|
| In: |
PentecoStudies
Year: 2024, Volume: 23, Issue: 1, Pages: 39-40 |
| Further subjects: | B
Theology
B Anthropology B Structuralism B Difference B Particularity |
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | In this brief rejoinder, I respond to Maltese’s three areas of questions. Taking the first two together, I explain that my use of verticality is not primarily a theological move but a theoretical one: attending to it reveals how the various structuralisms that pervade Christian ways of seeing the world are deeply entwined. In response to the third, I suggest that it is both possible and worthwhile to ascertain particularities of different cultural-religious perspectives in our work, so long as we also strive to problematize and historicize them at the same time. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1871-7691 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: PentecoStudies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1558/pent.30763 |
