Choosing, Picking, and Reason to Choose

This paper addresses the problem of hard choices agents confront in scenarios referred to as "Hard Cases." A key feature of Hard Cases is that an agent is presented with multiple options, each supported by reasons, but these reasons run out when considered against the reasons for other opt...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Yang, Seungchul (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2025
In: Ethical theory and moral practice
Year: 2025, Volume: 28, Issue: 1, Pages: 5-16
IxTheo Classification:NCA Ethics
VB Hermeneutics; Philosophy
Further subjects:B Decision Making
B Origin selection
B Incommensurability
B Logical Analysis
B Incomparability
B Comparison
B Reasoning
B Social Choice and Welfare
B Vagueness
B Equality
B Logic
B Parity
B Value Relation
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:This paper addresses the problem of hard choices agents confront in scenarios referred to as "Hard Cases." A key feature of Hard Cases is that an agent is presented with multiple options, each supported by reasons, but these reasons run out when considered against the reasons for other options. Another feature of Hard Cases is that it seems wrong for an agent to arbitrarily pick one option. Several views explain these features of Hard Cases, focusing primarily on the value relation between options, with discussions limited to the relata—namely, reasons for each option. However, reasons relevant to a choice encompass more than the set of reasons for individual options. After defining ‘choosing’ as distinct from ‘picking’ and introducing the notion of a ‘reason to choose,’ I argue that the reason to choose plays a role in what makes a case a Hard Case, and it is not necessarily grounded in any of the options but in the choice itself.
ISSN:1572-8447
Contains:Enthalten in: Ethical theory and moral practice
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1007/s10677-024-10472-x