Purity of Faith, Madhhab Partisanship, and Legitimising Ideology in the Great Seljuq Sultanate

The madhhab is usually investigated from the standpoint of fiqh. But there was also a social aspect to the importance of the madhhab, which at no time played a more crucial social role than during the Seljuq period (1040–1194). In particular, Ḥanafī madhhab affiliation became both the post-conquest...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tor, Deborah G. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2025
In: Islamic law and society
Year: 2025, Volume: 32, Issue: 1/2, Pages: 70-91
Further subjects:B Hanafism
B Seljuqs
B Khurasanis
B religious purity
B madhhab
B Turks
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:The madhhab is usually investigated from the standpoint of fiqh. But there was also a social aspect to the importance of the madhhab, which at no time played a more crucial social role than during the Seljuq period (1040–1194). In particular, Ḥanafī madhhab affiliation became both the post-conquest ideological justification for Seljuq rule, and the glue holding together the two elements of the Seljuq ruling class: The Turkish magnates and the Khurasani bureaucrats. This article proves three points: First, that the original Seljuq conquest neither looked like nor purported to be the religious mission the Seljuqs later claimed it was; second, it traces the post-facto madhhab-based justification of their rule which the Seljuqs adopted, and its success in obtaining Khurasani support for the Seljuq regime; and, finally, it shows also the negative consequences this ideology of partisan Ḥanafism had on the internal peace of their realm and its urban flourishing.
ISSN:1568-5195
Contains:Enthalten in: Islamic law and society
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/15685195-bja10061