Destabilizing the ‘equipoise’ framework in clinical trials: prioritizing non-exploitation as an ethical framework in clinical research

The framework of equipoise has been promulgated as an underlying requirement for conducting ethical clinical research. Equipoise is the term used for a state of indifference about which treatment intervention or innovation will provide the most benefit and the least harm to recipients. Drawing on he...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Schlichting, Douglas E. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2010
In: Nursing philosophy
Year: 2010, Volume: 11, Issue: 4, Pages: 271-279
Further subjects:B Nursing
B equipoise
B clinical research
B non-exploitation
B Clinical trial
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1925920429
003 DE-627
005 20250519102424.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 250519s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/j.1466-769X.2010.00455.x  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1925920429 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1925920429 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Schlichting, Douglas E.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Destabilizing the ‘equipoise’ framework in clinical trials: prioritizing non-exploitation as an ethical framework in clinical research 
264 1 |c 2010 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The framework of equipoise has been promulgated as an underlying requirement for conducting ethical clinical research. Equipoise is the term used for a state of indifference about which treatment intervention or innovation will provide the most benefit and the least harm to recipients. Drawing on healthcare, research, and ethics literature, this paper analyses the implications of equipoise from the perspective of several proponents and critics. Specifically the historical evolution of the concept based on Fried and Freedman's arguments is traced. A critique of the concept, informed by contrasting perspectives, is offered. An alternative framework of non-exploitation as presented by Miller and Brody is argued to be superior in facilitating both the ultimate goals of research on human subjects and those of the healthcare professions'. 
650 4 |a clinical research 
650 4 |a Clinical trial 
650 4 |a equipoise 
650 4 |a non-exploitation 
650 4 |a Nursing 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Nursing philosophy  |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 2000  |g 11(2010), 4, Seite 271-279  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)324655436  |w (DE-600)2029286-7  |w (DE-576)093981309  |x 1466-769X  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:11  |g year:2010  |g number:4  |g pages:271-279 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-769X.2010.00455.x  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext  |7 1 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1466-769X.2010.00455.x  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext  |7 1 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4725730904 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1925920429 
LOK |0 005 20250519102424 
LOK |0 008 250519||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a ixrk 
LOK |0 939   |a 19-05-25  |b l01 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw