A Criticism of the Argument for the Possibility of Religious Science
Having quoted a number of cases from contemporary science, some philosophers have shown that science has naturalistic biases and argued that in his encounter with such a science one can defend the possibility of religious (or Augustinian) science. In this essay we have shown that “argument of the po...
| Auteurs: | ; |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Publié: |
2025
|
| Dans: |
Theology and science
Année: 2025, Volume: 23, Numéro: 2, Pages: 298-304 |
| Classifications IxTheo: | CF Christianisme et science |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
empirical science
B Religious Science B presuppositions of science B science influenced by religion |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1925896870 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20251204150615.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 250517s2025 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/14746700.2025.2472122 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1925896870 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1925896870 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Taqavi, Mostafa |e VerfasserIn |0 (orcid)0000-0002-7755-1375 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 2 | |a A Criticism of the Argument for the Possibility of Religious Science |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2025 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Having quoted a number of cases from contemporary science, some philosophers have shown that science has naturalistic biases and argued that in his encounter with such a science one can defend the possibility of religious (or Augustinian) science. In this essay we have shown that “argument of the possibility of religious science” can only prove the possibility of “science influenced by religion” not the “possibility of religious science”. To this end, we have studied three issues: I) religious science, II) presuppositions that play a role in the formation of scientific content, and III) those norms that orient empirical data collection. | ||
| 601 | |a Argumentation | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a science influenced by religion | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Religious Science | |
| 650 | 4 | |a presuppositions of science | |
| 650 | 4 | |a empirical science | |
| 652 | |a CF | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Poostforush, Maryam |e VerfasserIn |0 (orcid)0000-0002-1085-9957 |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Theology and science |d Abingdon, Oxfordshire : Routledge, 2003 |g 23(2025), 2, Seite 298-304 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)372546447 |w (DE-600)2124364-5 |w (DE-576)261325019 |x 1474-6719 |7 nnas |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:23 |g year:2025 |g number:2 |g pages:298-304 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700.2025.2472122 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4725438367 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1925896870 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20251204150615 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 250517||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2025-05-16#DF774C9485BB04DF21CB58EAD2703F7436AB460C | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a zota | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 144204389X |a CF | ||
| ORI | |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
