A Criticism of the Argument for the Possibility of Religious Science
Having quoted a number of cases from contemporary science, some philosophers have shown that science has naturalistic biases and argued that in his encounter with such a science one can defend the possibility of religious (or Augustinian) science. In this essay we have shown that “argument of the po...
| Authors: | ; |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
2025
|
| In: |
Theology and science
Year: 2025, Volume: 23, Issue: 2, Pages: 298-304 |
| IxTheo Classification: | CF Christianity and Science |
| Further subjects: | B
empirical science
B Religious Science B presuppositions of science B science influenced by religion |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | Having quoted a number of cases from contemporary science, some philosophers have shown that science has naturalistic biases and argued that in his encounter with such a science one can defend the possibility of religious (or Augustinian) science. In this essay we have shown that “argument of the possibility of religious science” can only prove the possibility of “science influenced by religion” not the “possibility of religious science”. To this end, we have studied three issues: I) religious science, II) presuppositions that play a role in the formation of scientific content, and III) those norms that orient empirical data collection. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1474-6719 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Theology and science
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/14746700.2025.2472122 |
