Epistemologie, interpretatie en de mystieke factor: Een reactie op Van Bekkum, Burger, Van den Os en Bisschop
This article is a reply to four critics of my book The Epistemology of Reading and Interpretation. In particular, I reply to two main concerns: (1) that I have an improper respect for authorial intentions in the interpretation of texts; (2) that my approach cannot accommodate the phenomenon of "...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | Dutch |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
2025
|
| In: |
Kerk en theologie
Year: 2025, Volume: 76, Issue: 2, Pages: 206-225 |
| Further subjects: | B
Interpretation of
B Kuyper B author’s intention B Knowledge |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | This article is a reply to four critics of my book The Epistemology of Reading and Interpretation. In particular, I reply to two main concerns: (1) that I have an improper respect for authorial intentions in the interpretation of texts; (2) that my approach cannot accommodate the phenomenon of "existentially understanding" a text, which is so important when it comes to reading the Bible. My reply to the first concern is that there are very good reasons to give authorial intentions pride of place in interpretative processes. My reply to the second concern is that my approach does accommodate the phenomenon mentioned. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2773-1847 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Kerk en theologie
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.5117/KT2025.2.008.VWOU |
