Platón y el silogismo
The question of whether Plato could be the author of a first concept of syllogistic deduction (a method that Aristotle made known by means of a definition and a theoretical improvement in his Prior Analytics) was known in the antiquity and from that time, the question has usually examined by several...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
2010
|
| In: |
Veritas
Year: 2010, Volume: 22, Pages: 71-92 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Summary: | The question of whether Plato could be the author of a first concept of syllogistic deduction (a method that Aristotle made known by means of a definition and a theoretical improvement in his Prior Analytics) was known in the antiquity and from that time, the question has usually examined by several commentators. In this article, I comment on two passages of post-Aristotelian tradition; one is given by Boethius (which stems from Alexander of Aphrodisias) and the other was given by Johannes Philoponus in his commentary on Prior Analytics. The article intends to show that these passages contain information that is sufficient to come to an opinion favoring Plato, although it does not imply that they are sufficient to confer him the syllogistic method. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0718-9273 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Veritas
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.4067/S0718-92732010000100004 |
