Permaculture as Richard Bauckham’s Living with Other Creatures: : A Prefigurative Symbol for Messianic Redemption in Nature
To have moral standing to blame is to have a right to blame. But what kind of right is it, and what follows from having or lacking standing? I will argue that moral standing to blame should be understood as a power according to Wesley Hohfeld’s classification of rights (1913). It is a normative powe...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
2025
|
| In: |
De Ethica
Year: 2025, Volume: 8, Issue: 4, Pages: 57-74 |
| Further subjects: | B
Mark 1:13
B anticipatory religious symbol B David Holmgren B Ecotheology B Richard Bauckham B Permaculture |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Summary: | To have moral standing to blame is to have a right to blame. But what kind of right is it, and what follows from having or lacking standing? I will argue that moral standing to blame should be understood as a power according to Wesley Hohfeld’s classification of rights (1913). It is a normative power to call for an uptake of blame from someone who is liable to blame, i.e., someone who is blameworthy. The function of standing norms, I will argue, is to protect the freedom and interests of persons who are or could be blamed. I make three further claims in distinction to recent scholarship on standing: I argue that the concept of standing does not apply at all to private blame, only to expressed blame; I claim that standing cannot be understood as only a privilege-right; and I argue that there is not a conceptual asymmetry between standing to blame and standing to forgive. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2001-8819 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: De Ethica
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.3384/de-ethica.2001-8819.258456 |
