The Role of Neighbourhood Relations in Confessionalisation

By means of a statistical model we study the adoption of Protestantism during the Reformation for 262 territories of the Holy Roman Empire. Our unit of analysis is a territory and the dependent variable indicates whether and when the territorial ruler adopted Protestantism. The independent variables...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Roller, Ramona 1991- (Author) ; Schweitzer, Frank (Author) ; Strohm, Christoph 1958- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2024
In: Reformation & Renaissance review
Year: 2024, Volume: 26, Issue: 3, Pages: 190-210
Further subjects:B Confessionalisation
B Holy Roman Empire
B Geospatial relations
B Event History Model
B Statistical modelling
B Adoption of Protestantism
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Description
Summary:By means of a statistical model we study the adoption of Protestantism during the Reformation for 262 territories of the Holy Roman Empire. Our unit of analysis is a territory and the dependent variable indicates whether and when the territorial ruler adopted Protestantism. The independent variables are based on seven theoretical factors that historiographical research has identified to be important for the adoption of Protestantism,1 and on neighbourhood relations. We use an Event History Model to track changes in the variables over time and compute the importance of each driving factor. Our results reveal that geographic neighbourhood relations explain the adoption of Protestantism best. The more neighbours had become Protestant in the recent past, the more likely a territory was to become Protestant itself. This effect is strongest for weak territories, which may point towards a strategic hesitation to adopt Protestantism in politically uncertain times.
ISSN:1743-1727
Contains:Enthalten in: Reformation & Renaissance review
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1080/14622459.2024.2426084