Le accuse del sinedrio a Gesù
Giorgio Jossa writes this article based on his belief that the statement in Mark’s Gospel about the existence of two Sanhedrin meetings on the night before Jesus’ crucifixion is truly historical. According to Jossa, Mark is convinced that Jesus’ answer to Caiaphas’ question about his Messianic claim...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | Italian |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
2024
|
| In: |
Annali di storia dell' esegesi
Year: 2024, Volume: 41, Issue: 1, Pages: 61-78 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Jesus Christus
/ Caiphas
/ Mark
/ Sanhedrin
|
| IxTheo Classification: | HC New Testament |
| Further subjects: | B
Sanhedrin - Caiaphas - Jesus’
B s Gospel B s process - Gospel of Mark - Historical Value of Mark’ |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | Giorgio Jossa writes this article based on his belief that the statement in Mark’s Gospel about the existence of two Sanhedrin meetings on the night before Jesus’ crucifixion is truly historical. According to Jossa, Mark is convinced that Jesus’ answer to Caiaphas’ question about his Messianic claim was considered blasphemous by the high priest. However, Jesus was not condemned to death by the Sanhedrin (in the supposed night meeting). The Sanhedrin allegedly decided to turn Jesus over to Pilate on the charge of making himself king, and on that charge Pilate sentenced him to death. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1120-4001 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Annali di storia dell' esegesi
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.69071/114267 |
