The virtue of external goods in action sports practice

Consistent with the idea that business ethics is a form of applied ethics, many virtue ethicists make use of an extant (pure) moral philosophy framework, namely, one developed by Alasdair MacIntyre. In doing so, these authors have refined MacIntyre's work, but have never really challenged it. I...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Whelan, Glen ca. 20./21. Jh. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2025
In: Business ethics quarterly
Year: 2025, Volume: 35, Issue: 1, Pages: 84-114
Further subjects:B action sports
B philosophical perspective
B Applied Ethics
B Aufsatz in Zeitschrift
B MacIntyre
B Digital technology
B Virtue Ethics
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Description
Summary:Consistent with the idea that business ethics is a form of applied ethics, many virtue ethicists make use of an extant (pure) moral philosophy framework, namely, one developed by Alasdair MacIntyre. In doing so, these authors have refined MacIntyre's work, but have never really challenged it. In here questioning, and developing an alternative to, the MacIntyrean orthdoxy, I illustrate the merit of business ethicists adopting a broader philosophical perspective focused on constructing (new) theory. More specifically-and in referring to action sports (e.g., mountain biking, snowboarding)-I propose that an external good motive is not only much more consistent with virtuous practical excellence than MacIntyreans acknowledge, but that such a motive is fundamental to identifying and explaining how practices can be deliberately created (by businesses). Consequently, and in stark contrast with MacIntyre's deeply pessimistic outlook on modern business and society, I propose that those who value practices might celebrate our current era.
ISSN:2153-3326
Contains:Enthalten in: Business ethics quarterly
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1017/beq.2023.37