Making Ends Meet: A Conceptual and Ethical Analysis of Efficiency

Efficiency is often overlooked as an ethical value and seen as ethically relevant chiefly when it conflicts with other values, such as equality. This article argues that efficiency is a rich and philosophically interesting concept deserving of independent normative examination. Drawing on a detailed...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Mitchell, Polly (Author) ; Cribb, Alan 1956- (Author) ; Entwistle, Vikki A. (Author) ; Crowe, Sonya ca. 20./21. Jh. (Author) ; Utley, Martin ca. 20./21. Jh. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2024
In: Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal
Year: 2024, Volume: 34, Issue: 1, Pages: 1-26
Further subjects:B Measurement
B Deliberation
B healthcare administration
B Efficiency
B Value
B Management
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Description
Summary:Efficiency is often overlooked as an ethical value and seen as ethically relevant chiefly when it conflicts with other values, such as equality. This article argues that efficiency is a rich and philosophically interesting concept deserving of independent normative examination. Drawing on a detailed healthcare case study, we argue that making assessments of efficiency involves value-laden, deliberative judgments about how to characterize the functioning of human systems. Personal and emotional resources and ends are crucial to system functioning but are often discounted in favor of a relatively narrow set of financial inputs and institutional or procedural outputs. Judgments about efficiency tend to advantage (or disadvantage) different parties, depending on the resources and ends considered. Different constructions of efficiency can therefore promote or neglect the perspectives and interests of differently placed actors. Models of efficiency do not merely embody contestable ethical standpoints but—put to use—can unwittingly reify and reproduce them.
ISSN:1086-3249
Contains:Enthalten in: Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1353/ken.2024.a943428