Die Gottesfrage als Ziel- und Angelpunkt in der Philosophia von Béla von Brandenstein (1901-1989)
Einleitung: Was uns unbedingt angeht; I. Zwei Transzendierungen; II. Die Philosophie; III. Der Gottesbezug; IV. Das Absolute im Hiesigen; V. Die Urgründe: Gehalt - Form - Gestaltung UND IHRE VORMETAPHYSISCH-ONTOLOGISCHEN WISSENSCHAFTEN ALS TOTIK - LOGIK Mathematik; VI. Gott - vormetaphysisch; VII. G...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Print Article |
Language: | German |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
Published: |
2022
|
In: |
Folia theologica et canonica
Year: 2022, Volume: 11(33/25), Pages: 55-65 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
God
/ Trinity
/ Metaphysics
/ Brandenstein, Béla von 1901-1989
|
IxTheo Classification: | SB Catholic Church law |
Further subjects: | B
Foundations
B trinitarian ontology B alternating series proof B Metaphysics B Reasons B causal proof B God B Philosophy |
Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
Summary: | Einleitung: Was uns unbedingt angeht; I. Zwei Transzendierungen; II. Die Philosophie; III. Der Gottesbezug; IV. Das Absolute im Hiesigen; V. Die Urgründe: Gehalt - Form - Gestaltung UND IHRE VORMETAPHYSISCH-ONTOLOGISCHEN WISSENSCHAFTEN ALS TOTIK - LOGIK Mathematik; VI. Gott - vormetaphysisch; VII. Gott - metaphysisch; VIII. Mystik The following essay shows what role the problem of God plays in the work of Béla von Brandenstein (1901-1989), a German-Hungarian thinker of universal standing, especially in his “Grundlegung der Philosophie” (1965— 1970) and therein in his “Metaphysik/Wirklichkeitslehre” (1966). It becomes clear that the philosophical question of the reasons for being - its being-there and its being-so - as well as its cognition by human beings always comes up against final determinations (categories, principles, archai) at some point, which cannot be justified any further or which justify themselves and thus refer to an absolute or an unconditional which has a trinitarian structure. In addition, von Brandenstein develops independent proofs of God that show that the phenomena we know would not be experienceable if they were not ultimately made possible by a personal absolute. Above all, the so-called “alternating series proof” (Wechselreihenbeweis) and the “causal proof’ come into play here. In his post-metaphysical sciences of pragmatics, theory, poetics, ethics and philosophy of religion, von Brandenstein enriches his knowledge of God more and more, thus proving that a philosophy without God is not only without reason, but also without life, fullness, meaning, purpose and completion. A life without God is thus an “inhuman life”. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2063-9635 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Folia theologica et canonica
|