Patristic Apophaticism and the House of Being
This essay proposes a brief reflection on language, considering Patristic apophaticism, as seen in the works of the Cappadocian Fathers, Dionysius and Maximus the Confessor. It discusses Heidegger’s critique of onto‑theology and his Letter on Humanism, where language is called "the House of Bei...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
2022
|
| In: |
Diakrisis
Year: 2022, Volume: 5, Pages: 47-60 |
| Further subjects: | B
Heidegger
B Patristic apophaticism B the House of Being B Maximus B Language B Dionysius B energetic theory of language B Nous |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Summary: | This essay proposes a brief reflection on language, considering Patristic apophaticism, as seen in the works of the Cappadocian Fathers, Dionysius and Maximus the Confessor. It discusses Heidegger’s critique of onto‑theology and his Letter on Humanism, where language is called "the House of Being". It tries to show that, according to Patristic apophaticism, the human nous is instead the "House of Being". The difference between Heidegger and Patristic thought lies in how Being is understood. It also notes that the Letter on Humanism displays a potential openess to the "energetic theory of language", which characterises Patristic apophaticism. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2601-7415 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Diakrisis
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.24193/diakrisis.2022.3 |
