Gedanken zur Suffixaufnahme im Mittani-Brief
In Hurrian, genitive modifiers are morpho-syntactically treated as simply other attributes and are therefore subjected to agreement by copying the case marker of their head nouns ( Suffixaufnahme ). It is generally observed that, in the language of the Mittani Letter, when two hierarchically differe...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Recurso Electrónico Artigo |
| Idioma: | Alemão |
| Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Publicado em: |
2024
|
| Em: |
Altorientalische Forschungen
Ano: 2024, Volume: 51, Número: 2, Páginas: 265-269 |
| Outras palavras-chave: | B
Mittani Letter
B morpho-syntactic agreement B Suffixaufnahme B Hurrian |
| Acesso em linha: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Resumo: | In Hurrian, genitive modifiers are morpho-syntactically treated as simply other attributes and are therefore subjected to agreement by copying the case marker of their head nouns ( Suffixaufnahme ). It is generally observed that, in the language of the Mittani Letter, when two hierarchically different genitive attributes are related to the same head noun a restriction of the Suffixaufnahme occurs, whereby the higher-ranking genitive, i.e., the one immediately dependent on the head noun, fails to copy the case of the head noun, and the lower-ranking genitive then copies only the case marker of the higher-ranking genitive. This article aims at proving the validity of this established rule by discussing relevant passages from the Mittani Letter. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2196-6761 |
| Obras secundárias: | Enthalten in: Altorientalische Forschungen
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1515/aofo-2024-0011 |
