Vargas Pinto, T. (2024). Constante retorno del objetivismo en la responsabilidad. Crítica desde aportes de moralistas y juristas escolásticos ante una concepción asumida de versari in re illicita: = Constant Return of Objectivism in Responsibility. Criticism from Contributions of Scholastic Moralists and Jurists to an assumed Conception of versari in re illicita. Cauriensia, 19, 817-847. doi:10.17398/2340-4256.19.817
Citazione stile Chigago Style (17a edizione)Vargas Pinto, Tatiana. "Constante Retorno Del Objetivismo En La Responsabilidad. Crítica Desde Aportes De Moralistas Y Juristas Escolásticos Ante Una Concepción Asumida De Versari in Re Illicita: = Constant Return of Objectivism in Responsibility. Criticism from Contributions of Scholastic Moralists and Jurists to an Assumed Conception of Versari in Re Illicita." Cauriensia 19 (2024): 817-847, https://doi.org/10.17398/2340-4256.19.817.
Citatione MLA (9a ed.)Vargas Pinto, Tatiana. "Constante Retorno Del Objetivismo En La Responsabilidad. Crítica Desde Aportes De Moralistas Y Juristas Escolásticos Ante Una Concepción Asumida De Versari in Re Illicita: = Constant Return of Objectivism in Responsibility. Criticism from Contributions of Scholastic Moralists and Jurists to an Assumed Conception of Versari in Re Illicita." Cauriensia, vol. 19, 2024, pp. 817-847, https://doi.org/10.17398/2340-4256.19.817.
