Constante retorno del objetivismo en la responsabilidad. Crítica desde aportes de moralistas y juristas escolásticos ante una concepción asumida de versari in re illicita = Constant Return of Objectivism in Responsibility. Criticism from Contributions of Scholastic Moralists and Jurists to an assumed Conception of versari in re illicita
The easy attribution of effects from illicit conduct is well reflected in the usual objective understanding of versari in re illicita. The study shows how a series of inaccuracies from that meaning leads to maintaining an objective imputation that affirms responsibility (and liability) for results....
| Subtitles: | Constant Return of Objectivism in Responsibility. Criticism from Contributions of Scholastic Moralists and Jurists to an assumed Conception of versari in re illicita |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
2024
|
| In: |
Cauriensia
Year: 2024, Volume: 19, Pages: 817-847 |
| Further subjects: | B
imputación
B intención indirecta B versari in re illicita B voluntas per accidens B responsabilidad objetiva |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Summary: | The easy attribution of effects from illicit conduct is well reflected in the usual objective understanding of versari in re illicita. The study shows how a series of inaccuracies from that meaning leads to maintaining an objective imputation that affirms responsibility (and liability) for results. Although similar objective canonical references are found, the assignment of chance is not true in the scholastic use. The context of development of the versari, the confusion about the idea of casus, as well as explanations from Thomistic sources, make it possible to contradict the traditional objective interpretation of the maxim. Instead, in the Thomistic scholasticism there is a necessary relationship between objective and subjective aspects from the versari as an imputation rule. La fácil atribución de consecuencias a partir de una conducta ilícita se refleja bien en la comprensión objetiva usual de versari in re illicita. El estudio muestra cómo una serie de imprecisiones en tal comprensión lleva a mantener una imputación objetiva que afirma la responsabilidad por resultados. Si bien se hallan referencias canónicas objetivas, la asignación de lo fortuito no es realmente cierta en el uso escolástico. El contexto de desarrollo del versari, la confusión sobre la idea de casus, así como explicaciones desde fuentes tomistas, permiten contradecir la interpretación objetiva tradicional de la máxima. En cambio, en la concepción escolástica tomista se advierte una necesaria relación entre aspectos objetivos y subjetivos desde el versari como regla de imputación. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2340-4256 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Cauriensia
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.17398/2340-4256.19.817 |
