The Contribution of Eric Mascall to Theodicy and (Possibly) Providence

This article explores Eric Mascall's contribution to theodicy and (possibly) providence. It offers a taxonomy of Christian responses to the problem of evil: those which see suffering as instrumental to the purposes of God, those which see suffering as inevitable within the purposes of God, and...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lloyd, Michael Francis (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2024
In: Journal of Anglican studies
Year: 2024, Volume: 22, Issue: 2, Pages: 558-572
IxTheo Classification:NBC Doctrine of God
NBE Anthropology
Further subjects:B Providence
B non-coercive
B Theodicy
B Falling
B Interconnectedness
B Angels
B Suffering
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Description
Summary:This article explores Eric Mascall's contribution to theodicy and (possibly) providence. It offers a taxonomy of Christian responses to the problem of evil: those which see suffering as instrumental to the purposes of God, those which see suffering as inevitable within the purposes of God, and those which see suffering as inimical to the purposes of God. It offers a critique of all three families of such responses. It then locates Mascall's theodicy on that "map". It argues that Mascall's proposal, if accepted, removes the main argument against the inimical family of responses, which it sees as fitting best with the healing ministry of Jesus, as being most unambiguously committed to the goodness of God, and as being the most pastorally sensitive of the three categories. It also raises, without advocating, the possibility that all divine action may be indirect, thus safeguarding the non-coerciveness of God without compromising eschatological hope.
ISSN:1745-5278
Contains:Enthalten in: Journal of Anglican studies
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1017/S1740355324000573