La fenomenología del resentimiento según Scheler y Girard a la luz de la acedia en la Suma de Teología de Tomás de Aquino
After Friedrich Nietzsche explained the phenomenon of resentment through a supposed unmasking of a hidden emotional complex, later writers, like Max Scheler and René Girard, qualified Nietzschean analysis by applying it to various areas of anthropology and society. Many of the main contributions fro...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Publicado: |
2020
|
| En: |
Scientia et Fides
Año: 2020, Volumen: 8, Número: 1, Páginas: 221-242 |
| (Cadenas de) Palabra clave estándar: | B
Girard, René 1923-2015
|
| Otras palabras clave: | B
Scheler
B Nietzsche B Girard B moral falsehood B Thomas Aquinas B deadly sins |
| Acceso en línea: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Sumario: | After Friedrich Nietzsche explained the phenomenon of resentment through a supposed unmasking of a hidden emotional complex, later writers, like Max Scheler and René Girard, qualified Nietzschean analysis by applying it to various areas of anthropology and society. Many of the main contributions from these contemporary analyses find their roots in earlier authors, both modern and medieval. Six and a half centuries before Scheler, Thomas Aquinas offered in two questions of his Summa Theologiae dedicated to sloth and envy, a series of conceptual clarifications and psychological observations, which, in large part, share the same content and, at times, the form, with certain characterisations of resentment. Using many text references, we show the parallels between Schelerian phenomenology of resentment and the Thomasian explanation of the deadly sins. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2353-5636 |
| Obras secundarias: | Enthalten in: Scientia et Fides
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.12775/SetF.2020.002 |
