The Powers of Mimesis: Simulation, Encounters, Comic Fascism

This essay establishes a first genealogical link between William E. Connolly's pluralist thought and a recent mimetic turn—or re-turn of mimesis—in critical theory. Crafting new connections between Connolly's diagnostics of affective contagion, crowd behavior, and aspirational fascism, on...

Descrizione completa

Salvato in:  
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autore principale: Lawtoo, Nidesh 1976- (Autore)
Tipo di documento: Elettronico Articolo
Lingua:Inglese
Verificare la disponibilità: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Pubblicazione: 2019
In: Theory and event
Anno: 2019, Volume: 22, Fascicolo: 3, Pagine: 722-746
(sequenze di) soggetti normati:B Mimesis
B Girard, René 1923-2015
Accesso online: Accesso probabilmente gratuito
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Descrizione
Riepilogo:This essay establishes a first genealogical link between William E. Connolly's pluralist thought and a recent mimetic turn—or re-turn of mimesis—in critical theory. Crafting new connections between Connolly's diagnostics of affective contagion, crowd behavior, and aspirational fascism, on the one hand, and a Nietzschean diagnostic of the Dionysian powers of simulation, the mimetic unconscious, and the contagious intoxications it generates, on the other, the essay opens up new possibilities for encounters between new materialism, poststructuralism, and mimetic theory via the ancient view that humans are, for better and worse, imitative creatures—or Homo mimeticus. In the process, it align Connolly's insights into the powers of mimesis with a minor tradition in continental philosophy—from Nietzsche to Deleuze—and furthers a Janus-faced evaluation of satirical TV shows that fight contra (new) fascism at the level of the message, yet might further comic fascism at the level of the mass medium.
ISSN:1092-311X
Comprende:Enthalten in: Theory and event
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1353/tae.2019.0042