Between Alexandria and Antioch: The Diverse Sources of Basil’s Homiliae super psalmos 45

Patristic exegesis is often still viewed as a binary: Alexandria vs. Antioch, allegory vs. literal. While there are clear examples of interpreters who adhered to one school’s approach, there were many who sat somewhere between these two extremes. One notable example of this is Basil of Caesarea, who...

ver descrição completa

Na minha lista:  
Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor principal: Lee, Justin J. (Author)
Tipo de documento: Recurso Electrónico Artigo
Idioma:Inglês
Verificar disponibilidade: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Publicado em: 2024
Em: Scrinium
Ano: 2024, Volume: 20, Número: 1, Páginas: 60-91
Outras palavras-chave:B Origen of Alexandria
B Psalms
B Diodore of Tarsus
B Eusebius of Caesarea
B Allegory
B Alexandria
B Antioch
B Basil of Caesarea
B Patristic Exegesis
Acesso em linha: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Descrição
Resumo:Patristic exegesis is often still viewed as a binary: Alexandria vs. Antioch, allegory vs. literal. While there are clear examples of interpreters who adhered to one school’s approach, there were many who sat somewhere between these two extremes. One notable example of this is Basil of Caesarea, who, when actually studied as an exegete, has often been miscast as a student of Antioch or Alexandria. An examination of Basil’s Homiliae super psalmos 45, however, demonstrates that the sources behind Basil’s interpretive efforts cannot be limited to one exegetical ‘school’ or another, but actually represent a diverse range of readings, from Origen of Alexandria to Eusebius of Caesarea to Diodore of Tarsus. In his christological reading of this psalm, Basil resembles the Antiochenes, while in his overall spiritual vision and penchant for allegory, he draws on Origen. The example of Basil demonstrates the complexity of the exegetical world of the early church and the non-binary lines of influence, as well as the need for scholars of patristic exegesis to recognize nuance and complexity in their treatments of these writers.
ISSN:1817-7565
Obras secundárias:Enthalten in: Scrinium
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/18177565-bja10102