The Curiosity of Madeleine Hachard: Ursuline Missionaries and the Company of the Indies in Colonial Louisiana

This article proposes that the printed letters attributed to Madeleine Hachard (Rouen, 1728), one of the founding mothers of the Louisiana Ursulines in 1727, are a parody and not authentic primary sources as commonly thought. Drawing on new archival evidence and the methodologies of cultural history...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kostroun, Daniella J. 1970- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2024
In: The catholic historical review
Year: 2024, Volume: 110, Issue: 4, Pages: 682-723
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Hachard, Marie-Madeleine 1708-1760 / Louisiana / Ursulinen / Letter / Parody / Compagnie du Mississippi / Criticism
IxTheo Classification:CG Christianity and Politics
KAH Church history 1648-1913; modern history
KBQ North America
KCA Monasticism; religious orders
KDB Roman Catholic Church
Further subjects:B Louisiana. Colonialism
B Ursulines
B Jesuits
B France
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:This article proposes that the printed letters attributed to Madeleine Hachard (Rouen, 1728), one of the founding mothers of the Louisiana Ursulines in 1727, are a parody and not authentic primary sources as commonly thought. Drawing on new archival evidence and the methodologies of cultural history, literary analysis, and book history, it posits that an anonymous parodist purloined letters sent to France by other Ursulines, altered them, and then published them falsely under Hachard’s name. The parodist’s motive was to use the eighteenth-century trope of the ingénue to critique the disruptions of the Law System (also known as the “Mississippi Bubble”) (1718–1720) to the French Church.
ISSN:1534-0708
Contains:Enthalten in: The catholic historical review
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1353/cat.2024.a945397