[Rezension von: Dugan, Elena, The apocalypse of the birds : 1 Enoch and the Jewish revolt against Rome]

Elena Dugan’s book, The Apocalypse of the Birds: 1 Enoch and the Jewish Revolt Against Rome, seeks to overturn the prevailing scholarly consensus that the “Animal Apocalypse” (1 En. 85–90) is a unified work, written at the time of the Maccabean revolt or shortly thereafter. She argues that it is two...

Полное описание

Сохранить в:  
Библиографические подробности
Главный автор: Olson, Daniel C. 1955- (Автор)
Другие авторы: Dugan, Elena (библиографическое прошлое)
Формат: Электронный ресурс Обзор
Язык:Английский
Проверить наличие: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Опубликовано: 2024
В: Journal for the study of the pseudepigrapha
Год: 2024, Том: 34, Выпуск: 1, Страницы: 65-86
Рецензировано:The apocalypse of the birds (Edinburgh : Edinburgh University Press, 2023) (Olson, Daniel C.)
The apocalypse of the birds (Edinburgh : Edinburgh University Press, 2023) (Olson, Daniel C.)
The apocalypse of the birds (Edinburgh : Edinburgh University Press, 2023) (Olson, Daniel C.)
The apocalypse of the birds (Edinburgh : Edinburgh University Press, 2023) (Olson, Daniel C.)
The apocalypse of the birds (Edinburgh : Edinburgh University Press, 2023) (Olson, Daniel C.)
Другие ключевые слова:B 1 Enoch
B A new reading of the Animal Apocalypse of 1 Enoch
B Apocalypse of the Birds
B Animal Apocalypse
B Jubilees 4:19
Online-ссылка: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Описание
Итог:Elena Dugan’s book, The Apocalypse of the Birds: 1 Enoch and the Jewish Revolt Against Rome, seeks to overturn the prevailing scholarly consensus that the “Animal Apocalypse” (1 En. 85–90) is a unified work, written at the time of the Maccabean revolt or shortly thereafter. She argues that it is two works and that the second part, called by her “The Apocalypse of the Birds,” was written in the latter ‘60s C.E. It does not describe the Maccabean revolt, but the “first Jewish revolt” against Rome and the defeat of Cestius Gallus in 66 C.E. She points out that the latter part of the “Animal Apocalypse” is not attested at Qumran, and she tries to show on literary grounds that the work has two parts. She further points to many alleged deficiencies in the “Maccabean hypothesis” and strengths in her “Roman hypothesis.” This review constitutes a detailed rebuttal to Dugan’s book by a representative of the “Maccabean hypothesis.” It also makes a new and original case for an allusion to the “Animal Apocalypse” in Jubilees 4:19, something Dugan denies.
ISSN:1745-5286
Второстепенные работы:Enthalten in: Journal for the study of the pseudepigrapha
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1177/09518207241279023