Plato or Moses?: The Use of the Antiquity Argument in Hellenistic Jewish Writings

In antiquity, apologetic defences often included appeals to an ancient past. Fundamental to the ancient mind was a notion that favoured primitive wisdom over contemporary culture, antiquity over novel discoveries. In the ongoing clashes between cultures and ethnicities which signified the Hellenisti...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nyström, David E. 1975- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Taylor & Francis 2024
In: Scandinavian journal of the Old Testament
Year: 2024, Volume: 38, Issue: 2, Pages: 278–307
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Judaism / Hellenism / Classical antiquity / Apologetics
IxTheo Classification:HB Old Testament
Further subjects:B Hellenism
B Antiquity
B Early Judaism
B Apologetics
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:In antiquity, apologetic defences often included appeals to an ancient past. Fundamental to the ancient mind was a notion that favoured primitive wisdom over contemporary culture, antiquity over novel discoveries. In the ongoing clashes between cultures and ethnicities which signified the Hellenistic era, this notion was often combined with a competitive search for communal recognition and validity. This article offers a survey of Jewish authors in Hellenistic times, who engaged in this battle for old age. The article shows how various Jewish writers employed the antiquity argument through comparative historiography, in which they traced the roots of civilization to ancient heroes of Israel. The article ends with a discussion on the logic, structure, and purpose of the antiquity argument.
ISSN:1502-7244
Contains:Enthalten in: Scandinavian journal of the Old Testament
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1080/09018328.2023.2276461