Mark Goodacre’s The Case Against Q: A Retrospect Twenty-Two Years On
As part of NTT JTSR’s series on Key Texts, the present article discusses Mark Goodacre’s influential work, The Case Against Q. The book challenges the standard solution to the synoptic problem, the two-document hypothesis, arguing against the existence of Q and for Luke’s use of Matthew. This articl...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Amsterdam University Press
2024
|
In: |
NTT
Year: 2024, Volume: 78, Issue: 1, Pages: 36-50 |
Further subjects: | B
Synoptic Problem
B Synoptic Gospels B New Testament |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Summary: | As part of NTT JTSR’s series on Key Texts, the present article discusses Mark Goodacre’s influential work, The Case Against Q. The book challenges the standard solution to the synoptic problem, the two-document hypothesis, arguing against the existence of Q and for Luke’s use of Matthew. This article takes a critical look back at the book’s main arguments and examines the impact it has had on subsequent scholarship. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2590-3268 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: NTT
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.5117/NTT2024.1.003.DAVI |