Nonoverlapping Magisteria Versus Science-Religion Integration: Rereading Stephen Jay Gould
The principle of nonoverlapping magisteria (NOMA), by Stephen Jay Gould, is commonly cited in the science-religion literature as an archetype of a model separating the domains of science and religion. As such, NOMA represents the independence category in Ian Barbour’s science-religion typology. Howe...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Routledge
2024
|
| In: |
Theology and science
Year: 2024, Volume: 22, Issue: 2, Pages: 393–406 |
| IxTheo Classification: | CF Christianity and Science KAJ Church history 1914-; recent history KDB Roman Catholic Church |
| Further subjects: | B
Soul music
B Science and religion B Evolution B Scientific Materialism B Barbour B religion-science models |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Summary: | The principle of nonoverlapping magisteria (NOMA), by Stephen Jay Gould, is commonly cited in the science-religion literature as an archetype of a model separating the domains of science and religion. As such, NOMA represents the independence category in Ian Barbour’s science-religion typology. However, it is commonly neglected that NOMA also permits dialogue and even integration of scientific and religious inputs at the personal level, i.e. beyond the level of magisteria. To distinguish the two levels, it is essential to note that Gould considered the magisteria not as any kind of domain but closely related to teaching authorities. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1474-6719 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Theology and science
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/14746700.2024.2351648 |