Framing Effects Do Not Undermine Consent

Suppose that a patient is receiving treatment options from her doctor. In one case, the doctor says, "the surgery has a 90% survival rate." Now, suppose the doctor instead said, "the procedure has a 10% mortality rate." Predictably, the patient is more likely to consent on the fi...

全面介紹

Saved in:  
書目詳細資料
主要作者: Director, Samuel (Author)
格式: 電子 Article
語言:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
出版: 2024
In: Ethical theory and moral practice
Year: 2024, 卷: 27, 發布: 2, Pages: 221-235
IxTheo Classification:NCH Medical ethics
NCJ Ethics of science
VA Philosophy
ZA Social sciences
ZD Psychology
Further subjects:B Framing Effects
B 托拉斯
B Consent
B Nudging
在線閱讀: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
實物特徵
總結:Suppose that a patient is receiving treatment options from her doctor. In one case, the doctor says, "the surgery has a 90% survival rate." Now, suppose the doctor instead said, "the procedure has a 10% mortality rate." Predictably, the patient is more likely to consent on the first description and more likely to dissent on the second. This is an example of a framing effect. A framing effect occurs when "the description of [logically-equivalent] options in terms of gains (positive frame) rather than losses (negative frame) elicits systematically different choices." Framing effects are ubiquitous, but they are particularly troublesome in medicine. Many worry that there is tension between valuing informed consent and using framing effects in clinical settings. In this paper, I answer this question: if an individual is subject to a framing effect when she gives her consent, does this undermine the validity of her consent? I argue that framing effects do not undermine consent in general.
ISSN:1572-8447
Contains:Enthalten in: Ethical theory and moral practice
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1007/s10677-023-10412-1