The Experience of God: Escaping the Charge of Cognitive Penetration
By religious experiences I mean those human experiences characterised by a kind of intuitional seeming to the effect that a transcendent or all-encompassing being—God—exists. After explaining two significant similarities between religious and perceptual experiences, I will argue that the doctrine of...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
2024
|
| In: |
Heythrop journal
Year: 2024, Volume: 65, Issue: 3, Pages: 306-321 |
| IxTheo Classification: | CB Christian life; spirituality NBC Doctrine of God |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | By religious experiences I mean those human experiences characterised by a kind of intuitional seeming to the effect that a transcendent or all-encompassing being—God—exists. After explaining two significant similarities between religious and perceptual experiences, I will argue that the doctrine of phenomenal dogmatism about perceptual experiences can be applied to religious experiences as well. In the following two sections, the challenge arising from the objection from cognitive penetration is extended to the case of religious experiences. I show that the importance of this challenge may be dependent on a debate over the proper content of experience—namely the debate over low-level vs. high-level content. In the subsequent section, I argue that even if the religious experience is deemed an experience with low-level content, then the charge of cognitive penetration may not be avoided. Drawing upon the doctrine of divine simplicity, in the penultimate section, I argue that the experience of God has a specific characteristic which, in companion with its thin content, enables it to escape the charge of cognitive penetration. Alternatively put, the experience of God possesses an important epistemological advantage owing to its distinctive object, which makes it significantly reliable. In the final section, three possible objections are briefly addressed. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1468-2265 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Heythrop journal
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1111/heyj.14311 |