Thauma: Pain or Wonder?: Considerations Starting from Emanuele Severino and Martin Heidegger (Thauma: ¿Dolor o maravilla? Consideraciones a partir de Emanuele Severino y Martin Heidegger)
The topic of evil, variously understood, constitutes a fundamental object of questioning and problematicity, so much so that the Italian philosopher Emanuele Severino believes that the thauma from which philosophical research traditionally begins means precisely "anguished pain", caused, i...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Institution
2023
|
| In: |
Cauriensia
Year: 2023, Volume: 18, Pages: 599-612 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Summary: | The topic of evil, variously understood, constitutes a fundamental object of questioning and problematicity, so much so that the Italian philosopher Emanuele Severino believes that the thauma from which philosophical research traditionally begins means precisely "anguished pain", caused, in the last resort, from the becoming of entities. This article intends, first of all, to evaluate the argumentative cogency of the Severinian interpretation in reference to this/of this question and then, move on to analyze some of the writings in which Martin Heidegger deals with the same theme/subject: even the German philosopher has in fact provided interesting considerations that can be profitably used to grasp the most appropriate way of understanding this concept. The question that arises, in fact, is not purely terminological, but involves the same intonation that characterizes the philosophical question and the starting point from which it originates. From the comparison between the two philosophers, in addition to some interpretative limits that seem to be found in both, some significant convergences will emerge, at least in relation to the role that emotions play within the philosophical investigation. El tema del mal, entendido de diversas formas, constituye un objeto fundamental de cuestionamiento y problematización, tanto que el filósofo italiano Emanuele Severino cree que el thauma del que tradicionalmente parte la investigación filosófica significa precisamente "dolor angustioso", provocado, en última instancia, del/por el devenir de las entidades. Este artículo pretende, en primer lugar, evaluar la fuerza argumentativa de la interpretación severiniana en referencia a esta cuestión y luego pasar a analizar la forma en que Martin Heidegger aborda el mismo tema: incluso el filósofo alemán ha aportado, de hecho, interesantes consideraciones que pueden utilizarse provechosamente para captar la forma más adecuada de entender este concepto. La pregunta que surge no es en realidad puramente terminológica, sino que involucra la entonación misma que caracteriza la pregunta filosófica y el punto de partida del que parte/su punto de aprtida. De la comparación entre los dos filósofos, además de algunos límites interpretativos que parecen encontrarse en ambos, surgirán algunas convergencias significativas, al menos en relación con el papel que juegan las emociones dentro de la investigación filosófica. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2340-4256 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Cauriensia
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.17398/2340-4256.18.599 |