By another's death?: A theological exploration of the rhetoric of reconciliation

In South Africa, the rhetoric of reconciliation is complex and contested. Indeed, reconciliation itself is viewed as "a controversial symbol". In part, this may have to do with the different ways in which theological and social, political understandings drive the conceptualisation of recon...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Marais, Nadia 1987- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Stellenbosch University 2024
In: Stellenbosch theological journal
Year: 2024, Volume: 10, Issue: 3, Pages: 1-20
Further subjects:B Salvation
B Kudzunai Chiurai
B Reconciliation
B Rhetoric
B David Kelsey
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Description
Summary:In South Africa, the rhetoric of reconciliation is complex and contested. Indeed, reconciliation itself is viewed as "a controversial symbol". In part, this may have to do with the different ways in which theological and social, political understandings drive the conceptualisation of reconciliation in South Africa. Within the theological tradition, salvation has long been portrayed by way of the metaphor of reconciliation, and many theologians have engaged the fruitful but potentially confusing difference in assumptions regarding what reconciliation is and requires of us. For a thicker, more robust theological concept of reconciliation, it may be important to consider what the intended use is of this complex notion when employed as a soteriological concept. This article explores David Kelsey's portrayal of reconciliation by another's death with some suggestions for contours of a soteriological grammar of reconciliation that could shape more lifegiving ways of speaking about reconciliation in South Africa today.
ISSN:2413-9467
Contains:Enthalten in: Stellenbosch theological journal
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.17570/stj.2024.v10n3.a4