The Nature of Divine Immanence in Meister Eckhart’s Thought

For Eckhart, God is indistinct to creation; that is, supremely immanent or present to it. What, then, is left to be said about the creature’s union with God? Surely all the work is already done? Eckhart answers: yes and no. This paper traces the philosophical meaning of difference and sameness, dist...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Wojtulewicz, Christopher M. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group 2023
In: Medieval mystical theology
Year: 2023, Volume: 32, Issue: 2, Pages: 107-126
Further subjects:B principium
B Meister Eckhart
B Negation
B indistinction
B Union
B Immanence
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Description
Summary:For Eckhart, God is indistinct to creation; that is, supremely immanent or present to it. What, then, is left to be said about the creature’s union with God? Surely all the work is already done? Eckhart answers: yes and no. This paper traces the philosophical meaning of difference and sameness, distinction and indistinction, and finally transcendence and immanence in Eckhart’s thought. This does not yield the idea that we should straightforwardly turn from our composite nature in order to achieve union with God (a position long attributed to Eckhart). Instead, it shows that through an asymmetrical relation we become indistinct to God in virtue of our distinction; we are to discover union through our composite nature. Necessarily this means union with God is simultaneously and perpetually complete and incomplete. This follows from the fact that God is beyond the oppositional structure between distinction and indistinction, transcendence and immanence.
ISSN:2046-5734
Contains:Enthalten in: Medieval mystical theology
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1080/20465726.2023.2268461