Obstacles to moral articulation in interreligious engagement
The purpose of this paper is to confront a well-known problem in interreligious engagement in European institutions, namely the tendency to exclude contributions that do not conform to certain European expectations. It diagnoses problems produced not only by the problem but by certain solutions to i...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Taylor & Francis
2023
|
| In: |
International journal of philosophy and theology
Year: 2023, Volume: 84, Issue: 5, Pages: 309-325 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Sophocles, Antigone 332-375
/ Shakespeare, William 1564-1616, King Lear
/ Morals
/ Statement
/ Philosophy
/ Interfaith dialogue
/ Scriptural reasoning
|
| IxTheo Classification: | AX Inter-religious relations NCA Ethics TB Antiquity TJ Modern history VA Philosophy |
| Further subjects: | B
Articulation
B Ethics B Morality B Antigone B Scriptural Reasoning B King Lear |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Summary: | The purpose of this paper is to confront a well-known problem in interreligious engagement in European institutions, namely the tendency to exclude contributions that do not conform to certain European expectations. It diagnoses problems produced not only by the problem but by certain solutions to it, and to propose in outline an alternative approach. Chief among these problems is the imperative that members of traditions articulate their deepest moral commitments, in order to secure a common moral ground. This imperative has the unintended but drastic effect of excluding important voices in dialogue. Drawing on the figures of Cordelia (in Shakespeare’s King Lear) and Antigone (in Sophocles’ Antigone) it is argued that forced articulation distorts its objects. The theoretical framework of discussion is drawn from Hegel, Schelling, and Adorno as in interpreted by Alasdair MacIntyre, Charles Taylor, and Andrew Bowie. The originality of the argument is the use of aesthetic theory in German philosophy to inform a critique of attempts to make morality central to interreligious engagement. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2169-2335 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: International journal of philosophy and theology
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/21692327.2024.2308123 |