Satanizando a Herodes: Dos episodios de la «Wirkungsgeschichte» de Mt 2,13-16 y su intertextualidad con Apocalipsis 12
Although Mt 2,13-16 holds Herod accountable for his murderous deeds, several early Christian writers thought that he acted under the influence of Satan. Among them, Tyconius and Oecumenius are of special consideration since they were the first to provide a hermeneutical framework that evinced the as...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
2023
|
| In: |
Estudios eclesiásticos
Year: 2023, Volume: 98, Issue: 384, Pages: 3-34 |
| Further subjects: | B
intertextualidad
B Ecumenio B Herodes B Ticonio B History of effects B Satanás |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Summary: | Although Mt 2,13-16 holds Herod accountable for his murderous deeds, several early Christian writers thought that he acted under the influence of Satan. Among them, Tyconius and Oecumenius are of special consideration since they were the first to provide a hermeneutical framework that evinced the assertion. Therefore, this article intends to answer two questions: Why did Tyconius and Oecumenius think Satan was under the influence of Satan in Mt 2,13-16? and how did they reach this conclusion? To do so, this article employs Wirkungsgeschichte as its methodology. Accordingly, the satanization of Herod is the byproduct of reading Mt 2 and Ap 12 intertextually since the actions of the former are now seen under the light of the apocalyptic dragon. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2605-5147 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Estudios eclesiásticos
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.14422/ee.v98.i384.y2023.001 |