Rethinking the causes of islamisation: ontological (in)security, postcoloniality, and Islam in Malaysia

Theories about state-led Islamisation tend to attribute the phenomenon to domestic dynamics, such as political competition, institutional co-optation, and changing social norms. When exogenous factors are considered, they usually refer to imported ideologies. Moreover, Islamisation is often depicted...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Southeast Asian studies
Main Author: Chan, Nicholas (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press Oktober 2023
In: Journal of Southeast Asian studies
Year: 2023, Volume: 54, Issue: 3, Pages: 419-449
Further subjects:B International policy
B Political process
B Islam
B State
B Cause
B Religion
B Politics
B Malaysia
B Religious organization
B International political system
B Islamization
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:Theories about state-led Islamisation tend to attribute the phenomenon to domestic dynamics, such as political competition, institutional co-optation, and changing social norms. When exogenous factors are considered, they usually refer to imported ideologies. Moreover, Islamisation is often depicted as a firm rejection of the West. This article seeks to complicate those explanations. Using insights from the ontological security literature in International Relations, I argue that Malaysia’s state-led Islamisation cannot be understood comprehensively without looking at macro-historical factors, particularly Malaysia’s postcoloniality and its elites’ perception of the global order. Instead of being a manifestation of anti-West sentiments, I argue that the initial receptivity towards Islamisation by Malaysia’s largely secular ethnonationalist elites constitutes a quest for recognition within an international order within which the Muslim identity is racialised and stigmatised. This is most obvious in Mahathir Mohamad’s ideas on Islam, in that his calling for a developmentalist Islam has as its (imagined) respondent the stigmatising ‘West’. I argue that the forms of Islamisation undertaken during the Mahathir administration reflected this drive to catch up with the West while simultaneously securing recognition for Islam; and that such a leitmotif persisted even into the post-September 11, post-Barisan Nasional world.(GIGA/J Southeast Asian Stud)
ISSN:1474-0680
Contains:Enthalten in: Journal of Southeast Asian studies
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1017/S0022463423000450