Reconsidering Arabic Roots for the Tertia Via
This paper reopens the debate on the possibility that Aquinas borrowed his tertia via from a Latin translation of Maimonides ‘Guide for the Perplexed’. After introducing the text of the tertia via, I shall analyze the first part and conclude that while a ‘metaphysical’, tenseless reading is correct,...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Sciendo
2023
|
| In: |
European journal for the study of Thomas Aquinas
Year: 2023, Volume: 41, Issue: 1, Pages: 1-20 |
| IxTheo Classification: | BH Judaism FA Theology KAE Church history 900-1300; high Middle Ages NBC Doctrine of God VA Philosophy |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Summary: | This paper reopens the debate on the possibility that Aquinas borrowed his tertia via from a Latin translation of Maimonides ‘Guide for the Perplexed’. After introducing the text of the tertia via, I shall analyze the first part and conclude that while a ‘metaphysical’, tenseless reading is correct, we should not be nervous to call Aquinas’s reasoning for what it is: flawed. Framing the problematic passage in its historical context, I shall then argue that the flaw lies not so much with Aquinas, but with the source he was borrowing from. This is Maimonides’ Dalālat al-ḥāʾirīn ("The Guide for the Perplexed"), and in fact more specifically the blame is to be given to an early translator into Latin. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2657-3555 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: European journal for the study of Thomas Aquinas
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.2478/ejsta-2023-0001 |