A Poem in Two Contexts: Psalm 40:14–18 and Psalm 70 in their Canonical Setting
That Psalms 40:14-18 and 70 are (near) duplicates is well known. Previous research on these psalms has tended to focus on the question of origin, debating which was the original source for the other, with this then used to explain the variances between them, usually with the goal of establishing the...
| Autres titres: | Festschrift for Gert Prinsloo |
|---|---|
| Auteur principal: | |
| Collaborateurs: | |
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Unisa Press
2022
|
| Dans: |
Journal for semitics
Année: 2022, Volume: 31, Numéro: 2, Pages: 1-12 |
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Bibel. Psalmen 40,14-18
/ Bibel. Psalmen 70
/ Doublets
/ Contexte
|
| Classifications IxTheo: | BH Judaïsme HB Ancien Testament |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Psalms
B Prinsloo, Gert T. M. B canonical shaping B Publication commémorative B Text Criticism |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Résumé: | That Psalms 40:14-18 and 70 are (near) duplicates is well known. Previous research on these psalms has tended to focus on the question of origin, debating which was the original source for the other, with this then used to explain the variances between them, usually with the goal of establishing the original poem. This paper takes a different approach, arguing that the variances between the two are to be explained as evidence of shaping each to its current setting. These variances thus contribute to subtle changes in meaning between them which need to be recognised. |
|---|---|
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Journal for semitics
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.25159/2663-6573/12042 |