Reform or Necessary Change?: The Attempt to Translate the Ketubah into Hebrew and the Reactions to it
The original language of the Jewish ketubah is Aramaic, a language not understood by the average Jew in recent generations. Therefore, in various Jewish communities, translations of the ketubah into the spoken language of community in question have been proposed. This article examines proposals made...
| Published in: | Hebrew Union College annual |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
HUC
2022
|
| In: |
Hebrew Union College annual
Year: 2022, Volume: 93, Pages: 147-182 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Judaism
/ Ketubah
/ Aramaic language
/ National language
|
| IxTheo Classification: | BH Judaism |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | The original language of the Jewish ketubah is Aramaic, a language not understood by the average Jew in recent generations. Therefore, in various Jewish communities, translations of the ketubah into the spoken language of community in question have been proposed. This article examines proposals made during the latter half of the twentieth century to translate the ketubah into Hebrew - and the fate of these proposals. The main focus of this article surrounds the most significant of these translation initiatives, which was undertaken by the Religious Kibbutz Movement (HaKibbutẓ HaDati) in the 1950s when members of the Kevuẓat Yavneh Kibbutz advocated that their new Hebrew ketubah be used as Israel’s formal ketubah, to be given to all Jewish couples entering into marriage in the country. They tried to attain the approval of the Israeli Chief Rabbinate, but to their surprise, they were met with complete rejection. An examination of the justifications given by the Rabbinate for their decision to reject the translation initiative shows that their opposition was not based purely on halakhic considerations-rather, the changes made to the ketubah within Conservative Judaism at around the same time played a major role in determining the Rabbinate’s position. Expressing strong opposition to the new "Conservative ketubah", Israel’s Chief Rabbinate stated that no change should be made to the text’s traditional form. |
|---|---|
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion, Hebrew Union College annual
|