Reading the Bible in post-apartheid South Africa: The contribution of Gerrie Snyman

Modern historical criticism came to South Africa in the third decade of the twentieth century. However, analysing biblical books like human documents was not acceptable to church authorities. The historical-critical study of the Bible thus suffered a blow. It took four decades before some reformed b...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Spangenberg, Izak J. J. 1951- (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Publié: 2023
Dans: Old Testament essays
Année: 2023, Volume: 36, Numéro: 1, Pages: 14-40
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Christianisme / Réalisme / Herméneutique / Vulnérabilité / Supériorité
Classifications IxTheo:CA Christianisme
FD Théologie contextuelle
HA Bible
KBN Afrique subsaharienne
Accès en ligne: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Description
Résumé:Modern historical criticism came to South Africa in the third decade of the twentieth century. However, analysing biblical books like human documents was not acceptable to church authorities. The historical-critical study of the Bible thus suffered a blow. It took four decades before some reformed biblical scholars felt at ease to reintroduce historical criticism. However, during the seventh decade of the twentieth century, overseas biblical scholars were already experimenting with the research tools of modern literary studies. Some South African biblical scholars followed suit, and soon narrative criticism and reader-response criticism were part of the package of methods for reading and studying the Bible. Gerrie Snyman was one of them, and reader-response criticism assisted him in reflecting on how he as a white Afrikaans speaking male, can continue doing biblical research in the post-apartheid era. He developed a hermeneutic of vulnerability and argued that readers should take responsibility for their readings of biblical texts. https://doi.org/10.17159/2312-3621/2023/v36n1a3
ISSN:2312-3621
Contient:Enthalten in: Old Testament essays
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.17159/2312-3621/2023/v36n1a3